Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections

Collected essays, 2008-2010: Debating international justice in Africa

Jun 07, 2010

from the announcement by University of Oxford Centre for Socio-Legal Studies:

Assembling nearly two years of critical debates convened by Oxford Transitional Justice Research, the collection of nearly 60 essays explores the work of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and other judicial processes at a crucial stage in the development of international justice in Africa. The June 2010 review conference of the ICC in Kampala provides an opportunity to identify the successes and shortcomings of these processes and to lay the foundation for more effective approaches in the future.

The debates in this volume highlight that there is major disagreement over the performance and legacies of international justice institutions in Africa. The purpose of this collection is to deepen discussions of these issues and to provoke new questions about the past and future directions of international justice in Africa.

Note: One essay, The Force of Law and Problem of Impunity, by Yvonne Malan, includes this summary:

This essay focuses on why non-judicial approaches to transitional justice are less effective than is often claimed and why prosecutions are an important way of dealing with past injustice. It is often overlooked that arguments in favour of reconciliation have become a useful way to defend amnesty and impunity. Part of the uproar over Ocampo’s decision is based on a school of thought that has demonised criminal trials as a way of dealing with the past. There are of course other arguments against the ICC’s decision, but what I want to focus on is the prejudice against criminal trials and the dangers of non-judicial approaches.

The following essay, Bashir and the ICC: The aura or audition of international justice in Africa? by Stephen Oola, takes a contrary position:

Over the last four years, Ocampo’s ICC has increasingly resembled a misguided missile. To advocate for punitive justice only for Africa is to miss the target of comprehensive justice in the fight against impunity. Africa comprises societies accustomed to restorative justice approaches. Having suffered atrocities and abuses over decades, the fabric of African societies is torn and demands something more than convictions and imprisonment. The restoration of peace might be the first measure of justice in all of the African situations currently under investigation by the ICC.

Read the whole collection.

Document Actions

Peace is a first measure of justice

Posted by Achiro Winifred at Aug 17, 2010 11:35 AM
I think Oola gets it right. Without peace its unimaginable that justice can be done. If the ICC indeed frustrated the Juba Peace Talks-an i agree with Oola on this, what justice has it done? What injustices is the ICC doing to the growing victims of LRA retaliatory killings ongoing in CAR, DRC and southern Sudan? What justice would black south africans being enjoying if they had insisted on prosecuting all apathied leaders and forces? What justice has the Uganda War Crimes Division delivered in the absence of peace. Oolas view is the road to justice. Thanks

Add comment

You can add a comment by filling out the form below. Plain text formatting.

(Required)
Tell us your name.
(Required)
Enter your e-mail address.
(Required)
(Required)
(Required)

About RJOB

Correspondents

LN-blue

 lp-blue

lr

dv-blue

kw-blue

mw-blue