Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Personal tools

Navigation

RSS
Filter
Showing 3 posts filed under: Report [–] published between Jul 01, 2010 and Jul 31, 2010 [Show all]

Restorative justice’s impact on participants’ psychological and physical health

from the study by Tanya Rugge & Terri-Lynne Scott:

Research on restorative justice has cited many positive benefits for participants. For example, restorative justice processes are satisfying to both victims and offenders. However, despite references made to positive impacts on participants’ well-being, few studies specifically examine the impact of restorative justice processes on participants’ psychological health and physical health using specific health indicators.

This study utilized a quasi-experimental, repeated-measures design to assess changes in psychological and physical health in 92 participants (50 victims and 42 offenders) who experienced a restorative justice process.

Jul 27, 2010 ,

Hatfield research into youth crime project

from the article by Alex Lewis in St Albans and Harpenden Review:

A scheme to bring children in care homes who cause trouble together with their victims has been a success, a study at Hatfield's University of Hertfordshire has shown.

Jul 22, 2010 , , ,

Time for a fresh start: The report of the Independent Commission on Youth Crime and Antisocial Behaviour

From the executive summary of the report by the Independent Commission on Youth Crime and Antisocial Behaviour:

The Commission’s inquiry was prompted by concern about deep-rooted failings in the response to antisocial behaviour and crime involving children and young people. Large sums of public money are currently wasted across England and Wales because:

  • Investment in proven preventive measures and constructive sanctions is too low
  • Children and young people who could be turned away from a life of crime are not receiving timely help and support
  • Those involved in persistent and serious offending are often treated in ways that do little to prevent reoffending – and may make their criminal behaviour worse.
...The Commission has concluded that the public can be offered
better protection against youth crime and antisocial behaviour by:
  • tackling antisocial behaviour, crime and reoffending through the underlying circumstances and needs in children and young people’s lives (a principle of prevention)
  • ensuring that children and young people responsible for antisocial behaviour and crime face meaningful consequences that hold them accountable for the harm caused to victims and the wider community (a principle of restoration)
  • seeking to retain children and young people who offend within mainstream society or to reconnect them in ways that enable them to lead law-abiding lives (a principle of ntegration).

Jul 16, 2010 , , , ,

RSS
RJOB Archive
View all

About RJOB

Correspondents

LN-blue

 lp-blue

lr

dv-blue

kw-blue

mw-blue