Skip to content.
news
Home articlesdb articles Walgrave, Lode. On restoration and punishment: Favourable similarities and fortunate differences.

Summary

Walgrave, Lode (2001). On restoration and punishment: Favourable similarities and fortunate differences. In Restorative justice for juveniles: Conferencing, mediation and circles, ed. Allison Morris and Gabrielle Maxwell, 17-37. With a foreword by DJ Carruthers. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

The issue of punishment in relation to restorative justice constitutes a significant debate. For example, does or should restorative justice theory reject the idea of punishment? Should restorative justice reject all coerciveness in interventions as being punitive? Or, do restorative processes and obligations by their very nature actually constitute an alternative punishment rather than an alternative to punishment? Addressing the similarities and differences between punishment and restoration, Walgrave argues for a criminal justice system that is as deeply and comprehensively restorative as possible, even while allowing for some degree of coercive judicial intervention. In this perspective, he maintains that restorative measures are not tantamount to punishment, and he contends for the maximum possible restorative impact of even coercive judicial procedures and sanctions.


1379

RJ around the World

RJ Around the World

RJ Library

Search 8725 publications on restorative justice

Spotlight

Check out these sections of RJ Online


Legislation

Leading Edge

Defining Restorative Justice

Biblical Justice


What is Restorative Justice?

Restorative justice is a theory of justice that emphasizes repairing the harm caused or revealed by criminal behaviour. It is best accomplished through cooperative processes that include all stakeholders. More



Update


Sign up for free monthly updates on restorative developments around the world.

Submit an article for publication on RJ Online.