Skip to content.
news
Home articlesdb articles Walgrave, Lode and Aertsen, Ivo. "Reintegrative shaming and restorative justice: Interchangeable, complementary or different?"

Summary

Walgrave, Lode and Aertsen, Ivo (1996). "Reintegrative shaming and restorative justice: Interchangeable, complementary or different?" European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 4 (4): 67-85.

Walgrave and Aertsen note that Braithwaite indicated in early 1996 that he might replace the term "reintegrative shaming" with "restorative shaming." This leads Walgrave and Aertsen to ask whether "reintegration" and "restorative" are interchangeable or at least complementary. Or, in fact, are they different? To answer these questions, they examine the paradigm of restorative justice, and the concepts of shame as an active process and shame as an emotion. Using examples from Belgium, Walgrave and Aertsen consider shaming and restoration in the mediation process. Additionally, they reflect on the issue of coercion in relation to shaming and restorative justice.


1434

RJ around the World

RJ Around the World

RJ Library

Search 8725 publications on restorative justice

Spotlight

Check out these sections of RJ Online


Legislation

Leading Edge

Defining Restorative Justice

Biblical Justice


What is Restorative Justice?

Restorative justice is a theory of justice that emphasizes repairing the harm caused or revealed by criminal behaviour. It is best accomplished through cooperative processes that include all stakeholders. More



Update


Sign up for free monthly updates on restorative developments around the world.

Submit an article for publication on RJ Online.