Skip to content.
news
You are here: Home articlesdb articles Van Ness, Daniel W and Karen Strong. "Restitution to rehabilitation: How and why victims were removed from the criminal justice process."

Summary

Van Ness, Daniel W and Karen Strong (2000). "Restitution to rehabilitation: How and why victims were removed from the criminal justice process." Crime Victims Report 4 (January/February): 81, 92-93.

Van Ness and Strong note the analysis of the current interest in restitution and other aspects of restorative justice as a rediscovery of an old approach to crime and justice, an approach centered in community well-being and transactions between the offender and the victim to satisfy the injury caused by the offense. The authors point to ancient roots of restitution in small non-state societies, in larger societies with formal legal codes, and in the Old Testament. They then trace the demise of restitution in Europe and the rise of state-centered conceptions of crime and punishment. Early reform movements (e.g., in eighteenth century England) sought change by focusing on rehabilitation of offenders. Van Ness and Strong maintain that rehabilitation can in fact be good and effective to pursue, but that it should be complemented by goals and processes intended to address the needs and rights of victims.


1459

RJ around the World

RJ Around the World

RJ Library

Search 8902 publications on restorative justice
Restorative Justice Continuum
Howard Zehr discusses the need to think in terms of restorativeness.
What is Restorative Justice?
Restorative justice is a theory of justice that emphasizes repairing the harm caused or revealed by criminal behaviour. It is best accomplished through cooperative processes that include all stakeholders. More

Update

 

Sign up for free monthly updates on restorative developments around the world.

 

Submit an article for publication on RJ Online.