Skip to content.
news
You are here: Home articlesdb articles Ives, Dale E. Inequality, Crime and Sentencing: Borde, Hamilton and the Relevance of Social Disadvantage in Canadian Sentencing Law

Summary

Ives, Dale E (2003). Inequality, Crime and Sentencing: Borde, Hamilton and the Relevance of Social Disadvantage in Canadian Sentencing Law Queen's Law Journal. 30 (Fall): 114-155.

In R. v. Gladue n1 and R. v. Wells, the Supreme Court: of Canada adopted methodology for sentencing aboriginal offenders in the hope of reducing the overrepresentation of aboriginal peoples in Canada's prisons. Relying on section 718.2(e) of the Criminal Code, the Court held that in deciding on a fit sentence for an aboriginal offender, a judge must address two issues. First, the judge must take into account the unique systemic and background factors that may have contributed to the aboriginal offender being before the court. Second, the judge must consider the type of procedures and sanctions that may be appropriate in the circumstances given the offender's specific heritage or connection to an aboriginal community. (excerpt)


5596

RJ around the World

RJ Around the World

RJ Library

Search 8768 publications on restorative justice
What is Restorative Justice?

 

 

Restorative justice is a theory of justice that emphasizes repairing the harm caused or revealed by criminal behaviour. It is best accomplished through cooperative processes that include all stakeholders. More



Update

 

Sign up for free monthly updates on restorative developments around the world.

 

 

Submit

an article for publication on RJ Online.