Skip to content.
news
You are here: Home articlesdb articles Miller, Colin. Banishment from Within and Without: Analyzing Indigenous Sentencing under International Human Rights Standards.

Summary

Miller, Colin (2003). Banishment from Within and Without: Analyzing Indigenous Sentencing under International Human Rights Standards. North Dakota Law Review. 80: 253-288.

After long periods of forced subjugation and assimilation to European cultures and legal systems, many indigenous groups in Canada and United States are reviving and re-applying their traditional approaches to justice. One ancient sanction against wrongdoers that some groups have tried to reintroduce is banishment. In response, some criticize this practice as a cruel and unusual punishment, violating national and international human rights standards. Colin Miller in this paper supports the appropriateness of banishment. He argues that it is consistent with human rights norms and its use should be permitted. To detail his perspective, he discusses the following: the history, aspects, and purposes of banishment; arguments against banishment; and arguments for banishment.


5989

RJ around the World

RJ Around the World

RJ Library

Search 8782 publications on restorative justice
Restorative Justice Continuum
Howard Zehr discusses the need to think in terms of restorativeness.
What is Restorative Justice?
Restorative justice is a theory of justice that emphasizes repairing the harm caused or revealed by criminal behaviour. It is best accomplished through cooperative processes that include all stakeholders. More

Update

 

Sign up for free monthly updates on restorative developments around the world.

 

Submit an article for publication on RJ Online.