Skip to content.
news
Home articlesdb articles Davis, Stephen F. and Hartmann, David J. and Minor, Kevin I.. "Preserving Internal Validity in Correctional Evaluation Research: The Biased Assignment Design as an Alternative to Randomized Design"

Summary

Minor, Kevin I. and Hartmann, David J. and Davis, Stephen F. (1990). "Preserving Internal Validity in Correctional Evaluation Research: The Biased Assignment Design as an Alternative to Randomized Design" Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice. 6: 216-225.

Internal validity refers to the confidence with which changes in a dependent variable can be isolated from the effects of extraneous factors and causally attributed to the effects of an independent variable. While a randomized design is commonly recommended as the best way to preserve internal validity, random assignment of subjects to groups is not always feasible in evaluations of correctional programs. This paper argues that the biased assignment design, whereby subjects are assigned to groups according to controlled criteria, is a viable alternative means of preserving internal validity which should be employed more frequently by corrections researchers. The steps for using the biased assignment design are presented, as is a strategy for proper data analysis.


8262

RJ around the World

RJ Around the World

RJ Library

Search 8725 publications on restorative justice

Spotlight

Check out these sections of RJ Online


Legislation

Leading Edge

Defining Restorative Justice

Biblical Justice


What is Restorative Justice?

Restorative justice is a theory of justice that emphasizes repairing the harm caused or revealed by criminal behaviour. It is best accomplished through cooperative processes that include all stakeholders. More



Update


Sign up for free monthly updates on restorative developments around the world.

Submit an article for publication on RJ Online.