Skip to content.
news
Home Previous Editions 2003 November 2003 Edition Restorative Justice in Responding to Sexual Offending: A Web Review

Restorative Justice in Responding to Sexual Offending: A Web Review

Document Actions
The use of restorative justice in response to certain crimes requires special expertise and careful preparation. Sexual offending is one area that raises many questions. There are concerns about revictimization, power imbalances, the return of sex offenders to the community, and the prevention of reoffending. Nevertheless, many programmes are working in this area.

Below is a bibliography of online sources discussing the possibilities and limitations of restorative responses to sexual offending.[1]

Abuse

Bopp, Judie And Bopp, Michael. (1998). At the Time of Disclosure: A manual for Front-line Community Workers Dealing with Sexual Abuse Disclosures in Aboriginal Communities. Ottawa: Solicitor General of Canada.

As indicated in the title, Judie and Michael Bopp developed this manual to assist front-line community workers, especially those in Aboriginal communities, to deal more effectively with issues around sexual abuse disclosures. It is not a comprehensive volume covering all aspects of sexual abuse. Rather, it focuses on a specific aspect of this very complex and critical social problem, namely, the disclosure phase. The manual is intended to help community workers understand more clearly the many factors which must be considered when dealing with disclosures of sexual abuse and to ensure that the needs of everyone affected by the situation are being addressed. In the manual the authors offer information on the following topics: a brief introduction to community-based approaches to dealing with abuse; guidelines for facilitating disclosures of abuse and investigating allegations; issues and needs of those affected by abuse (e.g., the victim, the victim’s family, the abuser, the abuser’s family, the community, and the justice system); and suggestions and guidelines for planning the healing and restoration of balance after a disclosure of abuse.

Bushie, Burma. (1999). Community Holistic Circle Healing: A Community Approach. Paper presented at the Building Strong Partnerships for Restorative Practices conference, Burlington, Vermont, 5-7 August 1999.

The author describes the work of healing circles (akin to community and family conferences) in a Native community in Canada to deal with cases of sexual abuse. She describes in detail the participants, principles, procedures, and desired objectives (e.g., accountability, healing, restitution, reconciliation) of a Community Holistic Circle Healing model involving offenders, victims, family members, community members and leaders, social services professionals, and government criminal justice officials (crown attorneys and judges). Community Holistic Circle Healing is providing a concrete alternative to the standard Canadian criminal justice process for dealing with offenses.

Julich, Shirley. (2000). The irony of restorative justice. Paper presented at the Just Peace? Peace Making and Peace Building for the New Millennium conference, held in Auckland, New Zealand, 24-28 April. Auckland, New Zealand: Massey University, School of Social and Cultural Studies, Centre for Justice and Peace Development.

The dynamics of child sex abuse for its victims are complex and often contradictory. Some have theorized that “Stockholm Syndrome” can occur with victims of abuse. Stockholm Syndrome refers to the strange and contradictory relationship and identification that can develop on the part of hostages with their captors. In this paper, Shirley Julich investigates this syndrome and the complexity of recovery from abuse to assist practitioners of restorative justice in their preparation for and facilitation of restorative justice conferences involving adult victims of child sex abuse and their abusers.

McGrath, Carla M. (2000). Using Alternative Dispute Resolution to Respond to Indian Residential School Abuse. Dispute Resolution in Law Studies Award Papers. Canadian Forum on Civil Justice. 20 February 2003.

Roman Catholic, Anglican, and United Churches of Canada directed residential schools for aboriginal children from the 1840s to 1984. Funded by the federal government, the purpose of the schools was to assimilate aboriginal children into Euro-Canadian society. Conditions at the schools were generally poor and damaging to the children. The adverse conditions often included physical and sexual abuse. In recent years, thousands of victims have been filing civil actions against the churches and the federal government to enforce accountability and seek healing and redress. Carla McGrath expresses great sympathy with the perspectives and needs of the victims, but wonders whether civil litigation can achieve an appropriate and meaningful resolution of the issues. She contends that designing an alternative dispute resolution system to handle the civil litigation would be a more appropriate and meaningful option for victims and accused. Toward this end, she discusses the legal aspects of the problem, the parties’ interests and goals, alternative dispute resolution, and design issues and recommendations.

Ross, Rupert. (1995). "Aboriginal Community Healing in Action: The Hollow Water Approach.” Justice as Healing (Spring)

In response to instances of sexual abuse in an Ojibway community in Canada, a group of social service providers developed an alternate response to the criminal offences based at least in part on Native principles and practices. The accused may choose the normal criminal justice process or this alternate process. This latter process, involving the offender, victim, family members, and community members, includes criminal charging, the offender's acceptance and disclosure of his or her guilt, a Healing Contract, a Cleansing Ceremony, and often alternate sentencing.

Welfare, Anne And Miller, Robyn. (1999). A confrontative interview for victims of intrafamilial sexual abuse: An alternative to an apology that reverses power differentials in a therapeutic way. Paper presented at the Restoration for Victims of Crime Conference. Australian Institute of Criminology and Victims Referral and Assistance Service. Melbourne 

In their work with victims of sexual abuse, Welfare and Miller use a confrontational interview technique developed in response to the feminist critique of family therapy in the area of sexual abuse. They use this technique in an attempt to redress issues of power and control in the victim-perpetrator relationship. To explain this technique the authors contrast it with an apology interview. They also summarize research (e.g., method and results) related to the confrontational interview technique. The paper concludes with cautions and critical recommendations by Welfare and Miller with respect to using this technique.


Juvenile Sex Offenders

Baptista, Daniela And Wood, Catherine. (2002). Evaluating the SayStop Diversion Programme: Findings From the First Follow-up Study. University of Cape Town, Institute of Criminology and Dept. of Psychology. Down loaded 25 June 2003. 

This longitudinal study evaluates the outcomes and impact of the diversion programme developed and piloted on three occasions by SAYStOP (South African Young Sex Offenders Project) between 1997 and 1999. Method. The study set out to determine the effectiveness of the programme through gauging recidivism rates, assessing the impact of the programme content, and exploring the children’s experience of attending the diversion programme. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with children, who had attended one of the initial three SAYStOP diversion programmes and their caregivers. The interviews were conducted after a minimum time period of twelve month had past since their completion of the programme. Research problems resulted in only six of the 28 boys being interviewed. Results. The results suggested that SAYStOP had developed an intervention useful for holding children who have committed sexual offences accountable and providing them with an opportunity to reflect on their abusive behaviour. The sessions appeared to be fairly successful in accomplishing their individual aims and objectives. In particular, the children assessed seemed to have developed insight into their victim’s feelings and realised the importance of responsible decision-making. Group work seemed to be necessary and a beneficial aspect. None of the children interviewed reported any sexual re-offending subsequent to attending the programme. The study highlighted numerous research and methodological difficulties inherent in this type of longitudinal evaluation study. These problems and recommendations for future follow-up studies are discussed. Conclusion. This study, while limited, provides initial support for the continued use of the SAYStOP diversion programme when dealing with certain types of children accused of committing sexual offences. Authors' Abstract.

Doig, Marnie And Wallace, Ben. (1999). Sexual Offending and Restorative Justice: The Challenge for Family Conferencing Practice in South Australia. Paper presented at the Restoration for Victims of Crime Conference convened by the Australian Institute of Criminology in conjunction with Victims Referral and Assistance Service and held in Melbourne, September 1999. Australian Institute of Criminology. Down loaded 12 July 2003.

The authors of this presentation discuss family conferencing in South Australia, with emphasis on how victim-offender mediation has come to be used in juvenile jurisdiction to deal with sexual offences. Based on their experience and expertise in this sphere, and orienting the nature of their paper for practitioners, Doig and Wallace provide background to the history and jurisdiction of the Family Conference Team, review statistics regarding sexual offences dealt with at family conferences, and cover the process and challenges in victim-offender mediation in sexual matters.

Wood, Catherine And Ehlers, Louise. (2001). Towards a Viable Diversion Programme for Young Sex Offenders In South Africa. Social Justice Research Project. Institute Of Criminology, University of Capetown. Downloaded 25 June 03. 

The extent and seriousness of sexual abuse of children by other children has only recently been recognised as a problem in South Africa. As a result, children are seldom prosecuted or held accountable for their abusive behaviour. Furthermore, those who are prosecuted often receive postponed or suspended community service sentences due to an absence of appropriate sentencing options. In response, SAYStOP (South African Young Sex Offenders Project) was formed for the purpose of developing innovative and effective interventions to treat and manage young sex offenders. This paper outlines both the process involved in the development of an appropriate diversion programme and the implementation strategy adopted to ensure the long-term viability of this programme. Initially, the extent and nature of the problem in South Africa is briefly sketched. A description of the process involved in the development of the diversion programme follows. In this discussion, the focus is on the content and structure of this programme. Emphasis is placed on the uniqueness of the South African context and the challenges faced in dealing with issues such as poverty, rural/urban disparity, cultural differences, language barriers and varying levels of literacy. The second part of the paper focuses on the implementation of the diversion programme. Here, the initial piloting of the programme through one district court and the subsequent pilot expansion to twelve further magisterial districts are examined. This extension process presented a new series of challenges. The manner in which these were addressed in order to ensure the relevance and sustainability of the project is analysed. Finally, the lessons learnt throughout this process are examined, concluding with recommendations for the future development of this project. Authors' Abstract.

Offender Reintegration 

Correctional Services of Canada. (2002). Circles of Support and Accountability: A Guide To Training Potential Volunteers. Training manual 2002. Chaplaincy. Correctional Services of Canada. Downloaded 15 April 2003.  

Circles of Support & Accountability represent an innovative response to a controversial social issue in our society. The purpose of this manual is to assist in the training of volunteers who are willing to become a part of a Circle of Support and Accountability for warrant expiry sex offenders. This document is also an initial attempt at a distillation of the work and wisdom of many individuals across Canada who have worked with this still relatively new initiative. Its creation was occasioned by a recognition of the increasing need to develop greater consistency in the process and standards of orienting and training potential volunteers and professionals.

Correctional Services of Canada. (1996). Community reintegration project. InterActive Corrections (December).  

The Community Reintegration Project is an initiative to reduce the risk of re-offense by individuals convicted of sexual offenses, assist with their transition into the community, and address the fears of victims. The Mennonite Central Committee (Ontario), under an agreement with Correctional Services Canada, is the sponsor for this pilot project. The principal mode of providing reintegration assistance is through support groups or Circles of Support for sex offenders re-entering the community. The Circles of Support consist of volunteers primarily from the faith community. The ex-offender must commit to the Circle and its advice and help, pursue a predetermined course of treatment, and act responsibly in the community. Mediating between police, media, and the community-at-large, the Circle provides intensive support for the ex-offender. This document provides background to the project, a description of the problem, and principles and practices for developing and providing a Circle of Support.

Dyck, David. (2000). Circles of Support and Accountability: The Need to Make Room for More Victim/Survivor Input. Victim Offender Mediation Association.

The author writes about a program – Circles of Support and Accountability (CSA) – designed to enhance the safety of the community and reduce the risk of re-offence by released sex-offenders. To complement the restorative focus on the offender, he urges more programs that address the stated needs of victims/survivors, and he urges greater victim/survivor participation in existing programs, such as CSA. These steps, he believes, will move in the direction of a fuller and truer expression of restorative justice principles.

Sexual Assault 

Avalon Sexual Assault Centre. (1999). Formal Response of the Avalon Sexual Assault Centre to the N.S. Department of Justice. RE: The Restorative Justice Program. Submitted to the N.S. Department of Justice, Restorative Justice Programme, September 1999. 28 October 2002. Hot Peach Pages. 

In June 1998 the Nova Scotia Department of Justice introduced a restorative justice program for Nova Scotia. According to policy guidelines, cases of sexual and domestic violence are only to be referred to restorative justice processes at the post-conviction, pre-sentence phase. This report by staff of the Avalon Sexual Assault Centre expresses many questions and concerns about the use of restorative justice processes in such cases. Based on their experiences in dealing with abusive, violent situations, they maintain that sexual assault crimes are incompatible with the restorative justice model in its current form. In this regard, they also pose questions and make recommendations concerning community ownership, volunteerism, informal cautions and warnings, project timing, and research and analysis.

Daly, Kathleen. (2002). Sexual assault and restorative justice. In Restorative justice and family violence, ed. Heather Strang and John Braithwaite, 62-88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  

Kathleen Daly looks at the question whether restorative justice is appropriate in cases of sexual violence. She cautions at the outset of her essay that the problem of responding justly to such cases- refraining from punitive responses that further brutalize perpetrators without appearing to accept their violent behavior - is ultimately unsolvable. Yet, because sexual assaults occur, Daly pursues the problem in terms of its two components: how to treat harms as serious without harsh forms of punishment or hyper-criminalization? and how to do justice in an unequal society? She contends there may be a way forward in addressing the problem of responding justly if three things are done, which she explores in this essay: (1) rehabilitate “retribution” and make it part of restorative justice processes; (2) redefine the harm of rape, other forms of gendered harms, and violence more generally; and (3) recognize the variety of meanings and contexts of sexual violence, domestic violence, and family violence. To illustrate her points, she discusses a number of cases of sexual assault in South Australia disposed of by conferencing.

Koss, Mary And Bachar, Karen J And Hopkins, C. Quince. (2003). Restorative Justice For Sexual Violence. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 989: 384-396. Restore Program. Mel and Enid Zuckerman Arizona College of Public Health. Downloaded 23 October 2003. 

Problems in criminal justice system response to date and acquaintance rape, and the nonpenetration sexual offenses are identified: (1) these crimes are often markers of a career of sexual offense, yet they are widely viewed as minor; (2) perpetrators of these crimes are now held accountable in ways that reduce their future threat of sex offending; and (3) current criminal justice response to these crimes disappoints and traumatizes victims and families. In response to these identified problems, we are implementing and evaluating RESTORE, an innovative, victim-driven, community-based restorative justice program. Restorative justice views crime as harm for which the person responsible must be held accountable in meaningful ways. RESTORE uses a community conference to involve the victim, offender, and both parties' family and friends in a face-to-face dialogue directed at identifying the harm and developing a plan for repair, rehabilitation, and reintegration into the community.

[1] These resources were all found in the research database found at http://www.restorativejustice.org/asp/Advanced_search.asp. For more information please search the database to find resources on restorative responses to sexual offending that are not found on the web.


November 2003


Last modified 2008-01-03 04:54

RJ around the World

RJ Around the World

RJ Library

Search 8705 publications on restorative justice

Spotlight

Check out these sections of RJ Online


Legislation

Leading Edge

Defining Restorative Justice

Biblical Justice


What is Restorative Justice?

Restorative justice is a theory of justice that emphasizes repairing the harm caused or revealed by criminal behaviour. It is best accomplished through cooperative processes that include all stakeholders. More



Update


Sign up for free monthly updates on restorative developments around the world.

Submit an article for publication on RJ Online.