You are here: Home → Resources → Public Policy Resources → Court Cases → USA

USA

Up one level

Minnesota Supreme Court. State of Minnesota v. Signe Elissee Pearson, C9-99-2021 [2002]

This document presents the ruling of the Supreme Court of Minnesota in the appeal of a case by Signe Elissee Pearson against the State of Minnesota. A sentencing circle, in providing a sanction against an offender following a plea agreement, had recommended to a district court a stay of adjudication of a felony theft count against Signe Elissee Pearson. The district court followed this recommendation and stayed adjudication. The State of Minnesota appealed, and the court of appeals reversed the district court. In this ruling, the state Supreme Court reverses the ruling of the court of appeals, thus upholding the district court and the recommendation of the sentencing circle.

Grim, Judge Arthur . Pennsylvania Juvenile Delinquency Benchbook

The Pennsylvania Juvenile Delinquency Benchbook is intended to serve as a practical tool for working judges throughout this Commonwealth, offering them convenient access to all the information they need to effectuate the underlying purposes of the Juvenile Act: “Consistent with the protection of the public interest, to provide for children committing delinquent acts programs of supervision, care and rehabilitation which provide balanced attention to the protection of the community, the imposition of accountability for offenses committed and the development of competencies to enable children to become responsible and productive members of the community.”(excerpt)

Supreme Court of Florida. State of Florida vs. Paul Vanbebber, No. Sc01-2558.

aThese substantial sanctions fashioned by the trial court are tailored to fit the crime and offender, and also serve in some way to attempt to repair the damage caused by his terrible act. (excerpt)

Supreme Court of Florida. Corrected Opinion. NO. SC01-913. Department of Revenue vs. Kelvin M. Jackson.

Alternatives to incarceration could embrace a balanced and restorative approach to criminal justice.4 This approach requires the offender to be held accountable for his or her criminal actions by recognizing the harm done, including indirectly to his or her child, and by imposing a solution that would enable the offender to seek to repair the harm resulting from his or her criminal behavior, including the continued payment of child support. However, given that there are no such options available at this time, I would afford the trial courts as much discretion as possible in deciding when and whether a petition to modify should be granted.(excerpt)

Minnesota State Supreme Court Upholds Use of Sentencing Circles

A January 2002 Minnesota Supreme Court decision reinforced the purpose and decision-making authority of sentencing-circles. The case questioned whether a circle could include a stay of adjudication as a part of sentencing recommendations.